Open questions on the catalogue

With no maker we have nothing to put in the brand field, so these products are invisible in any search that names a designer or manufacturer. Even a partial pass on the higher value pieces would help.

All three name a maker in their description but not their title, so we have left the brand field blank rather than guess. They are very probably Cassina, but on pieces at this price that is Assembly's call to confirm, not ours to assume.

Same situation: the maker appears in the description only. Probably Cassina, but we will not write it until you say so.

Surfaced in a maker search but names the maker only in its body copy.

Eight products, several at a high price. Barcelona is both a design and a widely copied one, so getting the maker right matters more here than almost anywhere in the catalogue.

No title, no description, no tags. We genuinely have no idea what these are, and neither does a buyer who finds them.

For art, the artist is the single thing a buyer searches for. Without a name these four cannot be found by anyone who is not already browsing the site, and one of them is the most expensive item in the group.

A search result reading only 'Armchair' competes with every armchair on the internet. Once we know what the piece actually is, the title and the description can both do some work.

Mostly lighting, where origin and decade are what buyers search on. We can write these up properly from a short note on each.

A search result reading just 'LC1' tells a buyer nothing, and Google sees six near identical pages competing with each other. The prices say they are clearly not the same piece, so there is a real difference we could be describing.

Identical title and identical price, so nothing in the data tells them apart. If it is one piece listed twice, that is a stock problem rather than an SEO one and worth knowing either way.

If so, saying 'Pair' in the title fixes it outright, and the same price for a pair and a single is worth a second look.

Same as above. These three are the only products on the whole site whose descriptions we could not make unique, because nothing in the data distinguishes them.

Lower priority than the three above, because the price difference already suggests they are distinct. We would just rather not assume.

A PNG is several times heavier than the same picture as a JPEG, and page weight is the main reason the site feels slow from outside the UAE. The 88 named 'Screenshot' were captured off a screen rather than exported from the camera, so they will also look visibly soft next to the rest of the catalogue. Re-exporting them is the single biggest speed gain available, and it needs no development work.

The title and the address disagree, so one of the two is wrong. They are different chairs, and a buyer searching for either will land on the wrong page.

The tag was filing a painting into the rug collection. We can remove it at our end, we just want to confirm nobody added it on purpose.

It currently reads: 'Vintage furniture and collectible design in Dubai, curated for the stories each piece carries.' It keeps the voice and the meaning, but it is your copy and your call. We will change it to whatever you prefer, as long as it still names what the business sells and where it is.

Length is not the constraint, repetition is. Say the same thing on every page and Google treats it as boilerplate and discounts all of it. If each category says something specific about how that particular category is sourced, it can be as long as you like.